US EditionSupreme Court seems intent on taking small steps in dealing with challenges to Trump’s agenda
- The Supreme Court reviewed President Donald Trump's actions but did not grant his requests to fire the head of a watchdog office, which could stall administration plans.
- The Supreme Court has temporarily kept Hampton Dellinger in his job, impacting the firing of 5,000 federal workers.
- Critics have raised concerns about the potential for a constitutional crisis if the Trump administration defies court orders.
- The Federal Judges Association criticized disinformation that undermines public confidence in the judiciary, stressing the importance of normal judicial processes.
45 Articles
45 Articles
Supreme Court seems intent on taking small steps in dealing with challenges to President Donald Trump’s agenda
WASHINGTON — In fewer than 500 carefully chosen and somewhat opaque words, the Supreme Court has now weighed in twice on President Donald Trump’s rapid-fire efforts to remake the federal government. The justices did not give Trump’s administration what it sought. The court rejected the Republican administration’s position that it had the immediate power to fire the head of a watchdog office. In the other, the court slowed the effort to block the…
Chief Justice Roberts isn’t your hired gun
The Republican-appointed Justices on the Supreme Court are now six of the nine. Unsurprisingly, the ideological tilt of the Court is more conservative than it’s been in two or three generations. It shows. Last year, the Court took the conservative side in reducing deference to administrative agencies; deciding expansively in favor of presidential immunity (which of course benefits both liberal presidents and conservative ones, but the particular…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 72% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
