US EditionFederal courts won't refer US Supreme Court justice Thomas to attorney general over ethics
- The federal courts will not refer allegations against Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to the Justice Department, as stated by the judiciary's policymaking body on Thursday.
- Clarence Thomas claimed he was not required to disclose trips paid for by wealthy benefactors, citing close personal friendships, including with Republican megadonor Harlan Crow.
- The Supreme Court established its first code of ethics in 2023, but it lacks enforcement mechanisms, according to the report.
- U.S. District Judge Robert Conrad noted that a criminal referral for a Supreme Court Justice may not be legally permissible.
113 Articles
113 Articles
Democratic Lawmakers' Attempt to Take Out Clarence Thomas Gets Slapped Down by Judicial Conference
Democrats often sound miserable and crazy, but if you really want to hear them come unhinged, try two things. First, remind them that conservatives control the Supreme Court. And second, […] The post Democratic Lawmakers' Attempt to Take Out Clarence Thomas Gets Slapped Down by Judicial Conference appeared first on The Western Journal.
fox40jackson.com
Federal courts will not make criminal referrals to DOJ over separate ethics complaints against Justice Thomas
close Video GOP AG urges Supreme Court to uphold TikTok divest-or-ban law Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen warns of the dangers of the social media platform and reacts to a new app from Mexico for migrants facing deportation in the U.S. Separate ethics complaints filed by members of Congress and an advocacy group against Justices Clarence Thomas and Ketanji Brown Jackson will not be referred to the Justice Department, federal court…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 66% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
