Supreme Court takes up a Republican appeal to end limits on party spending in federal elections
OHIO, JUN 30 – Republicans argue spending limits infringe First Amendment rights, challenging a 2001 precedent; coordinated spending caps range up to $4 million in some Senate races, Federal Election Commission data shows.
- The Supreme Court will review a Republican-led 2025 challenge seeking to remove limits on coordinated party spending in federal elections.
- This challenge follows a 2022 Ohio lawsuit filed by Republican House and Senate campaign committees joined by J.D. Vance and Steve Chabot, with backing from the Trump administration.
- The contested federal election law provision is over 50 years old, was upheld previously in 2001, and faces opposition from Democrats who want to maintain spending limits.
- In 2025, coordinated spending limits for Senate races range from $127,200 in states with smaller populations to almost $4 million in California, while House spending caps vary between $63,600 and $127,200 depending on the state's representation. Election law expert Richard Hasen has expressed his expectation that the court will invalidate these limits.
- If the court removes these spending caps, large donors could direct unlimited funds to parties, potentially circumventing individual contribution limits, which raises concerns about increased corruption and inequality.
179 Articles
179 Articles
Wisconsin elections, already flooded with cash, could get even more expensive
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a GOP-backed challenge to a decades-old campaign finance law that limits how much parties can spend in coordination with candidates for federal office. By Annie Pulley, THE BADGER PROJECT Elections in Wisconsin are setting new spending records every year, but the U.S. Supreme Court appears set to allow even more money into political races across the country if it rules the way experts expect it to in a p…
Supreme Court To Decide Whether Political Parties Can Act Like Political Parties
By Hans von Spakovsky via The Daily Signal | July 07, 2025 Just before breaking for the summer recess, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a case in its October term that, in essence, concerns whether Congress can limit political parties from doing what they are formed to do — i.e., support their candidates. That’s the issue at stake in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission, an appeal from a 6th U.S. Circuit C…
Supremes to Decide Whether Political Parties Can Act Like Political Parties
Just before breaking for the summer recess, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a case in its October term that, in essence, concerns whether Congress can limit political parties from doing what they are formed to do—i.e., support their candidates. That’s the issue at stake in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission, an appeal from a 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in a case originally filed by then-…
SCOTUS Will Hear Republicans’ Challenge to Campaign Finance Limits
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a challenge to a 1971 campaign finance law that limits coordination between political parties and candidates. The challenge was brought by the National Republican Congressional Committee and two candidates, including then-Senator JD Vance. In a statement, Public Citizen called on justices to reject the challenge, writing, “In the 15 years since the Supreme Court’s Citizens United abysmal decision opened the fl
More About SCOTUS's 'GOP Guts Campaign Finance Law' Case
The Supreme Court is taking up another Republican legal case seeking to erode campaign finance law and give more power to the wealthy donors seeking to influence elections. On Monday, the court agreed to hear a challenge to campaign finance restrictions w limit the ability of party committees to directly coordinate spending with individual candidates. The anti-corruption group Public Citizen argues that this provision was put in place to "guard …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 57% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium






































