How the history of judicial elections led to the $100 million Wisconsin race
- In Wisconsin, voters will decide on April 1 whether liberals or conservatives will control the State Supreme Court in a technically non-partisan race between Waukesha County Judge Brad Schimel, backed by Republicans and former President Trump, and Dane County Judge Susan Crawford, supported by Democrats and former President Obama.
- The Wisconsin Supreme Court race is occurring because Justice Ann Walsh Bradley is retiring, and the outcome will determine whether the liberal justices retain their one-seat majority or if conservatives flip the court, impacting the ideological balance and future rulings.
- This election has garnered national attention and broken spending records, with over $90 million already spent and expectations of exceeding $100 million, fueled by intense interest and high-profile endorsements.
- According to Crawford, her opponent Schimel is running the race like it were a partisan race and is taking the position that there's nothing wrong with an 1849 law in Wisconsin, while Schimel stated that any judge should be respecting the will of the voters when it comes to issues before the court.
- The outcome of the election could have broad implications for Wisconsin, potentially impacting issues such as abortion rights, collective bargaining, the drawing of legislative district maps, business regulations, property taxes, and even who controls Congress in 2026, as well as pending cases before the court.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
22 Articles
22 Articles
All
Left
3
Center
5
Right
6
WisGOP: Announces RECORD number of election observer shifts for April 1st
MADISON, Wis. — The Republican Party of Wisconsin’s Election Integrity Team is fully prepared for Election Day. Over 2,400 Election Observer shifts are already scheduled for the Spring General Election on April 1st, with more being added daily. This is a record...
·Madison, United States
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources22
Leaning Left3Leaning Right6Center5Last UpdatedBias Distribution43% Right
Bias Distribution
- 43% of the sources lean Right
43% Right
L 21%
C 36%
R 43%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage