See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

Forensic Analysis Finds DOJ's Epstein Death Video Was Edited

METROPOLITAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, MANHATTAN, NEW YORK, JUL 11 – Metadata analysis by WIRED and experts reveals the DOJ’s Epstein prison video was edited with professional software, raising concerns about transparency despite no proof of deceptive intent.

  • The Department of Justice released nearly 11 hours of surveillance footage from a camera near Jeffrey Epstein's prison cell this week to address conspiracy theories about his suicide.
  • Metadata examined by WIRED and independent analysts reveals that the footage was altered using professional editing software—most likely Adobe Premiere Pro—rather than coming straight from the prison’s surveillance system.
  • The video file, compiled from at least two separate clips, was saved multiple times within a 23-minute period on May 23, 2025, by a user operating on a Windows system, adding complexity to the Justice Department’s explanation amid internal conflicts over disclosure.
  • Lawyer Alan Dershowitz confirmed that Epstein-related files and names exist but are suppressed, while commentator Mike Rothschild noted that unclear official explanations will fuel conspiracy theories further.
  • The video release and ensuing discord, including DOJ officials clashing over handling, suggest ongoing tension and unresolved questions that may sustain public skepticism about Epstein's death.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
Podcasts & Opinions

54 Articles

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 55% of the sources lean Right
55% Right
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Political Wire broke the news in New York, United States on Friday, July 11, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)

You have read 1 out of your 5 free daily articles.

Join millions of well-informed readers who use Ground to compare coverage, check their news blindspots, and challenge their worldview.