Published • loading... • Updated
Danish leader says kingdom can’t negotiate sovereignty after Trump’s Greenland about-turn
- On Jan 22, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen urged Denmark and Greenland to pursue constructive Arctic security talks respecting territorial integrity, emphasizing NATO’s involvement.
- Rising U.S. interest and past deployments explain the sensitivity as U.S. President Donald Trump abruptly stepped back on Jan 21 from tariff threats while the United States military scaled back from Greenland.
- Records show the U.S. keeps a permanent presence at Pituffik airbase under a 1951 agreement, while Greenland has autonomy but foreign affairs and defence remain Danish unless agreed.
- Frederiksen insisted only Denmark and Greenland can strike agreements, rejecting external deals without consent, while Aaja Chemnitz said nothing can be decided without Greenland’s participation and NATO has no mandate to negotiate without Greenland.
- Recent U.S. proposals and comments indicate ongoing pressure on Greenland’s status, with the Pituffik airbase’s 1951 U.S.-Denmark agreement framing future military access decisions.
Insights by Ground AI
89 Articles
89 Articles
"We can negotiate all political issues, but we can't negotiate our sovereignty," said the Danish Prime Minister on the US agreement with NATO on Greenland.
·Portugal
Read Full ArticleThe Danish Prime Minister wishes to continue "a constructive dialogue with his allies" but with respect for the "territorial integrity" of Denmark. "We cannot negotiate our sovereignty," she insisted on Thursday, 22 January.
·France
Read Full ArticleGreenland security talks must respect territorial integrity, says Denmark
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said on Thursday Denmark and Greenland remain open to constructive dialogue on Arctic security provided discussions respect her country’s territorial integrity.
·Johannesburg, South Africa
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources89
Leaning Left17Leaning Right11Center35Last UpdatedBias Distribution56% Center
Bias Distribution
- 56% of the sources are Center
56% Center
L 27%
C 56%
R 17%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium


























