US EditionDemocrats rip Clarence Thomas for not recusing himself from Supreme Court Trump argument
- Justice Thomas is facing calls to recuse himself from cases related to the 2020 election due to his wife's involvement and potential bias.
- Questions have arisen about Justice Thomas's ability to remain impartial after his wife advocated for Trump and spread false theories about election fraud.
- A poll showed that a majority of respondents believe Justice Thomas should recuse himself from 2020 election-related cases.
8 Articles
8 Articles
Democrats rip Clarence Thomas for not recusing himself from Supreme Court Trump argument
A number of Democrats blasted Justice Clarence Thomas for not recusing himself from a Supreme Court hearing over former President Trump’s ballot eligibility under the 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court heard arguments over whether states have the authority to disqualify candidates from running for office on Thursday, more than a month after Colorado decided to boot…
Clarence Thomas’ 'impartiality' questioned over refusal to recuse himself from Trump election case
When the U.S. Supreme Court began hearing oral arguments in Trump v. Anderson on Thursday morning, February 8, one of the justices asking attorney Jason Murray questions was Justice Clarence Thomas. Some of Thomas' critics have been arguing that he should have recused him from the case, which deals with the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to remove Donald Trump from their presidential ballot based on Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution's 14th …
Common Dreams
Raw StoryThomas Refusal to Recuse From Trump Case Called a 'Giant Middle Finger' to Democracy
"Ginni Thomas' involvement in the seditious conspiracy that led to the January 6 insurrection is a bald-faced conflict of interest," argued one watchdog.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 63% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
