Published 3 months ago

Democrats rip Clarence Thomas for not recusing himself from Supreme Court Trump argument

Justice Thomas is facing calls to recuse himself from cases related to the 2020 election due to his wife's involvement and potential bias.
Questions have arisen about Justice Thomas's ability to remain impartial after his wife advocated for Trump and spread false theories about election fraud.
A poll showed that a majority of respondents believe Justice Thomas should recuse himself from 2020 election-related cases.

Insights by Ground AI

Does this summary seem wrong?

0 Articles

All

Left

Center

Right

USA Today

Clarence Thomas should recuse himself from Trump Supreme Court case: Democrats

Some Democrats are pushing for Clarence Thomas to recuse himself from the Supreme Court case about whether Trump can stay on the ballot in Colorado.

3 months ago·United States

Read Full Article

The Washington Post

Analysis | Thomas and Trump face the same question: How far is too far?

The line between moral and immoral or legal and illegal is often blurry.

3 months ago

Read Full Article

The Hill

Democrats rip Clarence Thomas for not recusing himself from Supreme Court Trump argument

A number of Democrats blasted Justice Clarence Thomas for not recusing himself from a Supreme Court hearing over former President Trump’s ballot eligibility under the 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court heard arguments over whether states have the authority to disqualify candidates from running for office on Thursday, more than a month after Colorado decided to boot…

3 months ago·Washington, United States

Read Full Article

Raw Story

Thomas refusal to recuse from Trump case called a 'giant middle finger' to democracy

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who once went a full decade without speaking during oral arguments, asked the first question Thursday as the high court heard a case challenging former President Donald Trump's eligibility to run for a second White House term.But Thomas, whose initial question focused on whether the 14th Amendment is "self-executing," shouldn't even be involved in the case, progressive watchdogs and other observers arg…

3 months ago·United States

Read Full Article

Alternet

Clarence Thomas’ 'impartiality' questioned over refusal to recuse himself from Trump election case

When the U.S. Supreme Court began hearing oral arguments in Trump v. Anderson on Thursday morning, February 8, one of the justices asking attorney Jason Murray questions was Justice Clarence Thomas. Some of Thomas' critics have been arguing that he should have recused him from the case, which deals with the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to remove Donald Trump from their presidential ballot based on Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution's 14th …

3 months ago·Washington, United States

Read Full Article

Common Dreams

Thomas Refusal to Recuse From Trump Case Called a 'Giant Middle Finger' to Democracy

"Ginni Thomas' involvement in the seditious conspiracy that led to the January 6 insurrection is a bald-faced conflict of interest," argued one watchdog.

3 months ago·United States

Read Full Article

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/year

Coverage Details

Total News Sources0

Leaning Left5Leaning Right1Center2Last Updated3 months agoBias Distribution

63% Left

Bias Distribution

63% of the sources lean Left

Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Sources are mostly out of (0)

Democrats rip Clarence Thomas for not recusing himself from Supreme Court Trump argument

0 Articles

0 Articles

Clarence Thomas should recuse himself from Trump Supreme Court case: Democrats

Clarence Thomas should recuse himself from Trump Supreme Court case: Democrats

Analysis | Thomas and Trump face the same question: How far is too far?

Analysis | Thomas and Trump face the same question: How far is too far?

Democrats rip Clarence Thomas for not recusing himself from Supreme Court Trump argument

Democrats rip Clarence Thomas for not recusing himself from Supreme Court Trump argument

Thomas refusal to recuse from Trump case called a 'giant middle finger' to democracy

Thomas refusal to recuse from Trump case called a 'giant middle finger' to democracy

Clarence Thomas’ 'impartiality' questioned over refusal to recuse himself from Trump election case

Clarence Thomas’ 'impartiality' questioned over refusal to recuse himself from Trump election case

Thomas Refusal to Recuse From Trump Case Called a 'Giant Middle Finger' to Democracy

Thomas Refusal to Recuse From Trump Case Called a 'Giant Middle Finger' to Democracy

Coverage Details

Bias Distribution

Ownership

Similar News Topics

Similar News Topics