US EditionAccording to the Supreme Court Decision: Santander Pays Back Credit Fees
6 Articles
6 Articles
The Supreme Court declared a number of ancillary charges in credit agreements of Santander Bank inadmissible, the bank wants to refund this money. What is the concrete issue, and who is affected?
Going against the tide of a decision made at the beginning of the year, the Court of Cassation considers that, of course, customers must be vigilant in cases of scams, but also banks. Elements, in particular, must alert them!
A resident of Villa Regina managed to stop judicially the debit of more than 28 fraudulent purchases made with a credit card that had already been denounced as stolen. The local Civil Court ordered the French BBVA Bank and Mastercard to refrain from discounting the quotas corresponding to consumptions that the user never made or authorized. The ruling, which also prevents both banking entities from entering the women in the default base of the C…
The Court of Cassation overturned the vapor in bank disputes. Banks will no longer be able to defeat their victims so easily, contrary to what the court had been able to say at the beginning of the year.
In the banking world, and in particular in the area of means of payment, bank fraud is a major concern for banking institutions and their customers. By a judgment of 30 April 2025 (judgment of 30 April 2025 n° 219 F-D, appeal No. X 24-13.663 ), the Court of Cassation reaffirms the importance for a bank to be able to consolidate its defence in respect of bank fraud in support of documents produced during the debates. A small summary of the facts …
A few months after a decision of the Court of Cassation particularly severe for victims of bank fraud, a new decision of the same high court has changed this position... and ordered the bank to pay back its client.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
