Virginia Democrats ask Supreme Court to allow use of new congressional map
Virginia Democrats say the ruling would keep Republicans in five House seats and block a map that could give Democrats four more.
- On Monday, Virginia Democrats filed an emergency appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court seeking to revive a voter-approved congressional map projected to help the party gain four additional House seats.
- The Virginia Supreme Court's 4-3 decision on Friday invalidated the redistricting plan, finding lawmakers improperly initiated the ballot process after early voting had already commenced.
- Following the ruling, Democratic leaders reportedly discussed lowering the mandatory retirement age for state Supreme Court justices from 75 to 54, a move that would effectively vacate the entire court overnight.
- Legal experts consider the emergency appeal a long shot, as the U.S. Supreme Court typically avoids second-guessing state courts' interpretations of their own constitutions.
- Virginia Elections Commissioner Steven Koski warned that Tuesday, May 12, marks the final day for map adjustments, leaving lawmakers limited time to resolve the redistricting dispute before primary deadlines are disrupted.
233 Articles
233 Articles
Lewis: The sheer waste of Virginia’s redistricting referendum staggers the conscience
Last Friday’s unprecedented Virginia Supreme Court decision that nullified a Democratic-led statewide referendum for an extraordinary, brazenly partisan, mid-decade reapportionment should surprise no one.
Topic of the Week: Virginia Supreme Court Strikes Down the Results of Democrats’ Redistricting Referendum
Our analysts rated media coverage The post Topic of the Week: Virginia Supreme Court Strikes Down the Results of Democrats’ Redistricting Referendum appeared first on Ad Fontes Media.
Virginia GOP tells US Supreme Court that Democrats are out of time to redistrict
Virginia Democrats hoping to redistrict the state to their advantage are past the "point of no return," the state's Republicans have told the U.S. Supreme Court.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 46% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium







































