Supreme Court denies challenges to state laws banning assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines
- The Supreme Court declined to hear two gun cases involving a Maryland law banning assault-style weapons and a Rhode Island restriction on large-capacity magazines.
- Justice Clarence Thomas, along with Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, dissented, arguing the Maryland law may not align with a 2022 ruling.
- The Maryland law bans what the state calls 'assault weapons' that are similar to military-style firearms like the M16 and AR-15.
- Litigation regarding similar bans across the country continues, suggesting the issue may return to the Supreme Court.
268 Articles
268 Articles


Supreme Court rejects Maryland AR-15 case, and interest groups respond
BALTIMORE — It’s not clear if the Supreme Court’s decision to deny two gun cases, including a challenge to a Maryland ban on AR-15s, a semi-automatic rifle, will influence how other gun cases are determined. However, gun owners say the…
Klar: Supreme Court Keeps Its Powder Dry in Second Amendment Challenge
It might appear at first blush that the Supreme Court’s June 2 rejection of a Petition for Writ of Certiorari challenging Maryland’s 2013 ban of so-called “assault rifles” means blue-state restrictions on these and other controversial weapons are constitutionally secure. However, the Court has not decided any such thing; it has only deferred when that ... Read more Source
Clarence Thomas delivered one blistering message that left weapons ban advocates furious - Political Animal News
Justice Clarence Thomas can’t have been thrilled at what the Supreme Court just did on one challenge to Maryland weapons law. The Supreme Court’s rulings have been a mixed bag for conservatives despite Republican-appointed Justices now holding a Court majority. They just dealt a crushing blow. But Clarence Thomas delivered one blistering message that […]
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 51% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium