Supreme Court sides with Texas man who challenged law barring drug users from having guns
The ruling narrows the federal ban on gun possession by drug users and rejects the government’s claim that marijuana use alone makes someone dangerous.
- The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Thursday that the federal government cannot ban individuals from owning firearms solely because they are habitual or occasional marijuana users.
- The decision in United States v. Ali Danial Hemani struck down the application of a federal law which makes it a crime for an "unlawful user of... a controlled substance" to possess a firearm.
- Justice Neil Gorsuch delivered the court's opinion, writing that prosecuting a Texas man who kept a handgun in his home while admitting to regular marijuana use is inconsistent with the Second Amendment.
- The ruling is legally narrow and does not protect active impairment; the Court emphasized that while the government can still criminalize possessing a firearm while actively intoxicated, it cannot disarm citizens based strictly on off-duty, habitual consumption.
- The case originated after the FBI found a handgun at Hemani’s Texas home in 2022. The ruling directly impacts the legal status of millions of state-legal cannabis users and involves the exact same statute used to convict Hunter Biden.
139 Articles
139 Articles
‘Shall not be infringed’ — even if you're high, Supreme Court rules
A Texas man who told federal agents he smokes marijuana every other day just walked away from the Supreme Court with his gun rights intact.Federal agents had descended on Ali Hemani's Dallas-area home in 2022, chasing a terrorism lead that ultimately went nowhere.‘To state the analogy is to expose its deficiency.’What survived the raid was a confession. Hemani, who has American and Pakistani dual citizenship, surrendered his gun, showed agents t…
Supreme Court unanimously limits use of gun law used to prosecute Hunter Biden
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! The Supreme Court sided Thursday with a “habitual” marijuana user who challenged a federal law banning anyone who uses illegal drugs from legally possessing a firearm, a Second Amendment case that tested the limits of restricting gun ownership. The court ruled the law, which was used to prosecute Hunter Biden, was overbroad and improperly deprived the man at the center of the case of his right to posse…
The Supreme Court has good news for people who like weed and guns
You can smoke one of these now and still own a gun, thanks to the Supreme Court. | Justin Sullivan/Getty Images Do you like to smoke marijuana? Do you also enjoy firearms? If so, the Supreme Court has great news for you. On Thursday, the Supreme Court held in United States v. Hemani that the federal government may not categorically forbid an “unlawful user” of marijuana from possessing a gun. Hemani also has fairly broad implications for many d…
The Supreme Court (SCOTUS) unanimously ruled that the application of a federal law prohibiting the possession of weapons to drug users violated the Second Amendment in the case of Ali Danial Hemani, a U.S. citizen and Pakistani resident in Texas. The decision was drafted by Judge Neil Gorsuch and was supported by the nine magistrates of the court. The case analyzed the constitutionality of the charge against Hemani under section 922(g)(3) of the…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 46% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
