The Supreme Court Wants to Crush Regulation—But Not the Fed
- The Supreme Court granted a stay that prevents President Donald Trump from reinstating two federal officials he fired, Gwynne Wilcox and Cathy Harris, unless they win their lawsuits.
- Chief Justice John Roberts and five justices voted for this stay, while Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented.
- The ruling implies that Trump can remove officials at his discretion, indicating a shift in the interpretation of presidential powers under Article II.
- Experts from The Heritage Foundation view this ruling as a move towards limiting the administrative state and restoring the separation of powers in government.
8 Articles
8 Articles
The Supreme Court Wants to Crush Regulation—But Not the Fed
When my daughter Alice was six, she looked down at a roasted half-chicken on her plate, visualized it for the first time as the body of a once-living creature, and announced that she would henceforth be a vegetarian—“except for bacon.” I thought of Alice last Thursday when the Supreme Court ruled, in an unsigned emergency-docket opinion, that a president may fire any member of an independent federal agency—except at the Federal Reserve.Alice gav…


Supreme Court Gives Trump a Quiet, Yet Potentially Large Victory Against Administrative State
by Seth Lucas and John G. Malcolm As Americans began to prepare for Memorial Day weekend, the Supreme Court quietly handed President Donald Trump a significant victory in the fight to rein in the rogue D.C. bureaucracy. In a short, two-page order, the court stayed a district court order that directed Trump to reinstate two federal officials whom he had fired. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, …
Supreme Court Gives Trump a Quiet, Yet Potentially Large Victory Against Administrative State | The Star News Network
by Seth Lucas and John G. Malcolm As Americans began to prepare for Memorial Day weekend, the Supreme Court quietly handed President Donald Trump a significant victory in the fight to rein in the rogue D.C. bureaucracy. In a short, two-page order, the court stayed a district court order that directed Trump to reinstate two federal officials whom he had fired. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, …
The Court Lets Trump Run Amok Over Agencies That Protect Workers and …
One venerable bit of folk wisdom has forever contended that there are different laws for the rich and the poor. The words inscribed over the doors to the Supreme Court—“Equal Justice Under Law”—were chiseled there to dispel such notions, though the actual decisions of the Court often tend to comport more closely with the folk [...]
The Supreme Court Should Resist Handing Sweeping Removal Powers to this President in the Name of Constitutional Purity
The UnPopulist illustrationThe Trump administration’s push to roll back limits on the president’s “removal power” did not come out of nowhere. Its effort to fire principal officers at the Federal Trade Commission, the National Labor Relations Board, and beyond has a long pedigree in the sane, buttoned-down wing of the conservative legal movement.But while the argument for handing a president this authority has theoretical merit, the Supreme Cour…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 75% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage