Study: Humans Evolved to Follow Experts, Not Tyrants
Study shows humans evolved a 'prestige psychology' favoring voluntary deference to experts, creating social hierarchies distinct from dominance by force, based on lab and computer model evidence.
- On February 3, researchers led by an evolutionary anthropologist reported that computer-evolution models and lab experiments with U.S. volunteers found humans evolved a 'prestige psychology' favoring expertise over sheer power.
- Building on decades of discoveries, researchers found pre-agriculture human societies showed relative equality with subtle status differences, while complex technologies and teaching made expertise crucial after farming emerged 12,000 years ago.
- Above a threshold, simulations found simulated virtual populations reached a tipping point where stronger prestige-seeking turned egalitarian groups into steep influence hierarchies, while small laboratory groups of U.S. volunteers formed clear leaders.
- Researchers caution that while prestige-based leaders can benefit followers and groups, hierarchies risk abuse, failed leadership, and elevating poor performers, so leaders must be held accountable.
- The study bears on current debates by showing natural selection appears to have favored prestige-sensitivity even as dominance and exploitation persist, affecting leadership and inequality across workplaces, sports teams, and society more broadly where high-ranking men may have reproductive advantages.
8 Articles
8 Articles
From leadership to influencers: Why people choose to follow others
For a long time, most scientists believed that early human hunter-gatherer societies were mostly equal, with little hierarchy or leadership, and that strong inequalities only emerged later with farming and complex societies.However, new research out of Arizona State University is challenging this.
Human prestige psychology can promote adaptive inequality in social influence - Nature Communications
Human hunter-gatherer groups were commonly thought to be broadly egalitarian, with increasingly formal hierarchical social structures hypothesized to spread following the introduction of agriculture. However, this view is being challenged by mounting evidence for social hierarchies in several foraging populations. Nonetheless, the processes by which such hierarchies emerge, and whether human hierarchies are homologous with non-human systems of d…
From leadership to influencers: New ASU study shows why we choose to follow others
The ASU study challenges the idea that early human societies were largely egalitarian, arguing instead that inequality in social influence has deep evolutionary roots. Drawing on archaeological evidence, psychological experiments and evolutionary simulations, researchers found that humans naturally form “prestige hierarchies” in which individuals gain influence not through dominance or aggression, but because others perceive them as …
A human tendency to value expertise, not just sheer power, explains how some social hierarchies form
Leaders can seem to emerge from the group naturally, based on their skill and expertise. Hiraman/E+ via Getty ImagesBorn on the same day, Bill and Ben both grew up to have high status. But in every other way they were polar opposites. As children, Bill was well-liked, with many friends, while Ben was a bully, picking on smaller kids. During adolescence, Bill earned a reputation for athleticism and intelligence. Ben, flanked by his henchmen, was …
Human Prestige Drives Adaptive Social Influence Inequality
In the intricate web of human social structures, the mechanisms underlying influence and status have long fascinated psychologists and social scientists alike. A groundbreaking study recently published in Nature Communications sheds new light on the complex interplay between prestige psychology and social influence,
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium




