Published • loading... • Updated
Lawson Relieved as He Reveals FIA Support Following Mexican Near-Miss
Liam Lawson was cleared by the Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile after a near-miss with marshals, despite Mexico's OMDAI Sport blaming him for unsafe driving.
- On 06/11/2025, Racing Bulls driver Liam Lawson rejoined the race and encountered two marshals running across the racing line at Turn One of the Autodromo Hermanos Rodriguez, and he said `I was very surprised`.
- An order for marshals to collect debris was rescinded when Lawson pitted out of sequence, eliminating the planned gap as the pack would pass through the Turn 1 and 2 chicane.
- Last week the FIA released an interim statement fully absolving Liam Lawson of blame after reviewing team and in-car data and apologised to him.
- OMDAI Sport Mexico initially blamed Lawson for insufficient caution as yellow flags were waved, and Lawson said he was surprised they posted that without research.
- The incident revived memories of the 1977 Tom Pryce marshal fatality, underlining trackside risks as the FIA is still investigating and urging improved safety measures for marshals.
Insights by Ground AI
17 Articles
17 Articles
Lawson Relieved As He Reveals FIA Support Following Mexican Near-miss
Racing Bulls' Liam Lawson revealed on Thursday that he received clear support from the FIA after being wrongly blamed by the Mexican authorities for a near-miss as marshals ran on track during last month's Mexican Grand Prix.
·New York, United States
Read Full ArticleLiam Lawson ‘surprised’ to be blamed for Mexico GP incident
Lawson Surprised by Blame for Mexico GP Incident Liam Lawson, the Racing Bulls driver, has expressed his surprise after being singled out for blame by the Mexican federation concerning a near-miss incident involving marshals during the Mexican Grand Prix two weeks ago. This incident occurred on the fourth lap at the Autodromo Hermanos Rodriguez, where [...]
Coverage Details
Total News Sources17
Leaning Left1Leaning Right0Center4Last UpdatedBias Distribution80% Center
Bias Distribution
- 80% of the sources are Center
80% Center
L 20%
C 80%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium











