US EditionJustice Ketanji Brown Jackson emerges as a leading dissenter in an era of Trump
UNITED STATES, JUL 9 – Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the sole dissenter in an 8-1 Supreme Court ruling allowing President Trump to proceed with large-scale federal workforce reductions, calling the decision "hubristic and senseless."
- Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote a solo dissent, criticizing a recent court decision as 'truly unfortunate' and 'hubristic and senseless.'
- Jackson argued that the majority's decision allows the executive branch to grow at Congress's expense and negatively impacts the public.
- She expressed concern that the court contributes to a culture of disdain for lower courts and their rulings, which could harm governing institutions.
- Jackson warned that the decision could deprive Medicaid recipients in South Carolina of a crucial means to enforce their rights granted by Congress.
42 Articles
42 Articles
The Ketanji Brown Jackson Dissents Reveal an Important Truth About the Supreme Court
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court issued a two-paragraph order that allows the Trump administration to move forward with gutting some two dozen federal agencies, moving ever closer to realizing the conservative movement’s demented fever dream of making the government small enough to drown in a bathtub. The only justice who noted their dissent was Ketanji Brown Jackson, who over the course of 15 pages came as close as a Supreme Court justice w…
Jonathan Turley: Justice Jackson Shows ‘Judicial Abandon’ in Latest Anti-Trump Dissent
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson stood alone in dissent Tuesday as the nation’s highest court ruled 8–1 in favor of allowing the Trump administration to move forward with a sweeping plan to reduce the size of the federal workforce. The post Jonathan Turley: Justice Jackson Shows ‘Judicial Abandon’ in Latest Anti-Trump Dissent appeared first on Slay News.
Ketanji Jackson pushes ideology over the Constitution
When a Supreme Court justice warns that the decisions of her colleagues pose an “existential threat to the rule of law,” it’s not just a legal disagreement – it’s a performance. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s recent dissents, particularly in Trump v. Casa, show a troubling shift in the role of a justice. Instead of offering careful counterpoints rooted in constitutional reasoning, she delivers ideological monologues that sound tailor-made for M…
Even A Former Dem Strategist Has Had Enough Of Biden-Appointed Justice’s ‘Tone’
by Jason Cohen at CDN - Former Democratic strategist Dan Turrentine said on Wednesday that he is not a fan of how political Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson sometimes appears to be. Even the other liberal justices on the bench wouldn’t join Jackson on Tuesday in opposing President Donald Trump’s administration’s endeavors to downsize the federal workforce. In response to … Click to read the rest HERE-> Even A Former Dem Strategist Has…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 62% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
