US EditionFBI Revelations Raise Questions About Mueller Special Counsel Investigation
- A recently declassified FBI document revealed that Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team used a secret 'Prohibited Access' classification during the Trump/Russia collusion investigation to hide key evidence in Washington, D.C., in September 2019.
- This classification arose amid concerns that the Mueller probe concealed potentially exculpatory or impeachment evidence, and it remains unclear whether Special Counsel John Durham and congressional overseers accessed all relevant information.
- The FBI's Sentinel case management system applies 'Prohibited Access' to documents, making them invisible in keyword searches and inaccessible to many agents, which legal experts and former prosecutors like Jay Town found staggering and previously unknown.
- Senator Chuck Grassley's 43-page declassified electronic communication shows that relevant documents on Fusion GPS contractor Nellie Ohr, who is alleged to have lied to Congress, were restricted under 'Prohibited Access,' hindering investigators' ability to pursue criminal misconduct.
- These revelations raise urgent questions about DOJ and FBI transparency, the government’s obligation to disclose material evidence, and the integrity of investigations into the Trump campaign and Russia collusion allegations.
10 Articles
10 Articles
The Mueller Special Counsel Was A Cover-Up - Geller Report
The revelation of the “Prohibited Access” secret FBI staff of records is a crime of enormous magnitude. The @FBI designed a system to hide evidence from the defense. Diabolical. When do these criminals start going to jail. Related: Newly Declassified FBI Document Proves Fusion GPS Contractor Nellie Ohr Lied to Congress about Contributions to Crossfire Hurricane Latest FBI Revelations Show The Mueller Special Counsel Was A Cover-Up, And Much Mor…
FBI Revelations Show Mueller Special Counsel Was A Cover-Up
Recent disclosures from the FBI have brought renewed attention to the actions of the Mueller Special Counsel investigation. The information released has sparked discussions among lawmakers and experts, with some suggesting it reveals inconsistencies and possible mismanagement within the investigation. Supporters of the original probe argue that the new details do not change the fundamental findings, while others believe the revelations highlight
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 86% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
