US EditionJudge reinstates gag order in Trump federal election case
- A federal judge reinstated a gag order on Donald Trump in the Washington case accusing him of trying to overturn his 2020 election defeat, denying his bid for a stay pending appeal.
- Judge Tanya Chutkan reimposed the narrow order after Trump violated a partial gag order in a separate fraud trial in New York by attacking court staff, leading another judge to fine him.
- Trump's legal team argued that the gag order infringed on his First Amendment rights, while the prosecutors claimed he attempted to intimidate potential witnesses with his social media posts.
118 Articles
118 Articles
Federal judge reimposes gag order on Donald Trump in 2020 election interference case
The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump's 2020 election interference case in Washington has reimposed a narrow gag order barring him from making public comments targeting prosecutors, court staff and potential witnesses.
Trump rails against Judge Tanya Chutkan after she reimposes partial gag order in Jan. 6 election interference case
Former President Donald Trump lashed out at federal Judge Tanya Chutkan on Monday after she reimposed a partial gag order barring him from targeting witnesses in his federal election interference case.
What Trump can say and can’t say under a gag order in his federal 2020 election interference case
A gag order in Donald Trump's election interference case in Washington is back in place, restricting the former president's inflammatory rhetoric as he prepares for trial and campaigns to return to the White House in 2024.
The judge in the federal trial of former US President Donald Trump for her alleged unlawful attempts to reverse the results of the 2020 election has restored restrictions on any public comment by the parties aimed at prosecutors, court staff and witnesses.
What Trump can say and can't say under a gag order in his federal 2020 election interference case
The gag order in Donald Trump's 2020 election interference case in Washington bars him and anyone else involved in the case from making public statements targeting prosecutors, court staff or "any reasonably foreseeable witness."
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 43% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
