Injunction Dysfunction or Tyrant Disruption? Trump-Era Judicial Paralysis Explained

Injunction Dysfunction or Tyrant Disruption? Trump-Era Judicial Paralysis Explained

Can a single judge unilaterally thwart the president of the United States?

Judicial Tyranny: Do Federal Judges Have Authority Over the Executive Branch?

In recent weeks, unelected federal judges have issued dozens of orders blocking President Donald Trump from enforcing myriad policies. The injunctions stem from more than 146 legal challenges, so far, to the administration’s actions. Current Court Orders According to White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller, federal judges have issued a stunning 30 injunctions stopping the executive branch from en…

A confrontation between the Trump-Vance Administration and a federal judge in Washington, D.C., has raised concerns about judicial excess, executive authority, and national security.Read more]]>

Injunction Dysfunction Or Tyrant Disruption? Trump-Era Judicial Paralysis Explained

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

Should Petty Judicial Tyrants Really Be Allowed to Act As Dictators?

Injunction Dysfunction or Tyrant Disruption? Trump-Era Judicial Paralysis Explained ⋆ Conservative Firing Line

The following article, Injunction Dysfunction or Tyrant Disruption? Trump-Era Judicial Paralysis Explained, was first published on Conservative Firing Line. Can a single judge unilaterally thwart the president of the United States? That’s the contentious question the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to resolve last week in response to court orders blocking its effort to curtail birthright citizenship, and after a slew of decrees requ…