US EditionDespite Contributions Deducted From Employees’ Salaries, They Weren’t Deposited With ESIC: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction U/S 85(A) ESI Act - Business Manager
Summary by Business Manager
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.1 Articles
1 Articles
All
Left
Center
Right
Despite Contributions Deducted From Employees’ Salaries, They Weren’t Deposited With ESIC: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction U/S 85(A) ESI Act - Business Manager
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a company’s general manager under Section 85(a) of the ESI Act, remarking that despite contributions deducted from the employees’ salaries, they were not deposited with the ESIC. The Court dismissed an Appeal against the decision of the Karnataka High Court, which dismissed the Criminal Revision Petition filed by the Appellant challenging the conviction under Section 85(a) of the Employees’ State Insura…
Coverage Details
Total News Sources1
Leaning Left0Leaning Right0Center0Last UpdatedBias DistributionNo sources with tracked biases.
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
