US EditionD.C. grand jury declines to indict woman accused of threatening to kill Trump
- A grand jury in Washington, D.C. chose not to bring charges against 50-year-old Nathalie Rose Jones for allegedly making threats against President Donald Trump in August 2025.
- Jones faced these charges after posting violent threats on Instagram and Facebook and admitting to the Secret Service she planned to kill Trump with a bladed object if given the chance.
- Jones was arrested following a protest in Washington, D.C., and initially detained without bond before Chief Judge James Boasberg released her under electronic monitoring on August 27, ordering psychiatric evaluation.
- Federal public defender A.J. Kramer described the evidence as weak, and U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro, who had previously failed to secure indictments in similar cases, expressed frustration over grand jury refusals.
- The grand jury's decision and Jones's release under monitoring suggest prosecutors might retry but currently face challenges securing indictments in threats cases involving social media posts.
87 Articles
87 Articles
Trump loses in grand jury
Donate to Democratic candidate Adam Frisch. Donate to Palmer Report. Hi, it's Bill Palmer. I'm back. Help me raise $10,000 this week: Donate nowWhat on earth is going on with the Trump administration? They’re turning into a laughing stock – that’s what’s going on. Once again, a federal grand jury said no way to indicting someone. This is sort of becoming a regular occurrence. The woman who was to be indicted reportedly made threats and called D…
DC Grand Jury Refuses to Indict Woman Accused of 'Oddly Specific' Threats Against Trump
Turns out that making “oddly specific” threats against the sitting President of the United States is not worthy of much punishment in 2025. Apparently, you just need the right judge […] The post DC Grand Jury Refuses to Indict Woman Accused of 'Oddly Specific' Threats Against Trump appeared first on The Western Journal.
DC grand jury passes on indicting second person accused of threatening Trump
A federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., has for the second time this week decided against indicting a defendant accused of threatening President Trump. Public defender Elizabeth Mullin confirmed to The Hill on Tuesday that a grand jury returned a "no bill" against her client, Edward Dana, meaning the panel of District residents decided that the evidence against him was not sufficient to indict. Dana was arrested after he was seen damaging a li…
DC grand jury declines to move forward with Trump threat case
A D.C. grand jury has declined to bring charges against a woman accused of threatening President Donald Trump on social media. This marks the fourth time in recent weeks that jurors in the District have passed on similar cases. Other recent grand jury decisions in D.C. Last week, Straight Arrow News reported federal prosecutors were unable to secure an indictment against Sean Dunn, the man accused of throwing a Subway sandwich at a Customs and B…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 43% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
