US EditionHow Badly Have US Strikes Damaged Iran’s Nuclear Facilities? Here’s What to Know | News Channel 3-12
- On June 22, 2025, the US military struck three key Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan in a coordinated attack.
- This followed a series of Israeli missile strikes beginning June 13 targeting Natanz and other nuclear facilities to hinder Iran's nuclear program.
- The strikes caused damage to the electrical systems at Natanz and resulted in at least six substantial craters at the heavily fortified Fordow facility, indicating the likely use of bunker-busting munitions.
- David Albright of ISIS said total destruction of Fordow’s underground enrichment hall is likely, while the IAEA confirmed no off-site radiation increase so far.
- The attacks significantly disrupted Iran’s nuclear program but full damage assessments remain pending, and geopolitical tensions are expected to continue rising.
23 Articles
23 Articles
U.S. strikes Iran’s key nuclear sites: What next? International Affairs Editor Stanly Johny answers key questions
Trump made the comments at the White House on June 21 night, hours after announcing the U.S. military had carried out strikes against three key nuclear facilities in Iran.
der Standard AT
der Standard DEAlthough no increased radiation levels have been measured after the attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, these risks pose to the local population
Could US strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites cause radiation leak?
Iran nuclear sites hit: The US has struck Iran’s nuclear facilities, including Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, on Sunday. Could this pose a danger? Experts say that there has been limited contamination so far; there is no radiological risk. Here’s why
Donald Trump's two-week period of concern lasted only two days: now, US bombers have attacked Tehran's nuclear facilities, and Iran's neighbors fear an expansion of the war. About the possible consequences of the nocturnal attack.
Even if it is difficult, there are good reasons for the US attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. The alternative would be a nuclear armed Islamist terrorist state.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 46% of the sources lean Left
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
