The Supreme Court Rejected Cristina Kirchner's Challenge Against Lorenzetti and Can Now Define the Road Case

Mediazona

Left

Factuality

Ownership

The Supreme Court of Russia quashed the appeal against the sentence of the former officers of the IRZO-1 Maksim Wolf, Andrei...

la Nacion

Lean Right

Factuality

Ownership

The highest court dismissed the presentation of the former president without proceeding; the time for the final sentence on the conviction was shortened

Infobae

Lean Left

Factuality

Ownership

Now the three judges must decide whether to reject the former president's appeal to have the sentence of six years' imprisonment and disqualification from holding public office, or whether to review the case.

Pausa

Factuality

Ownership

The rejection came with the vote of Lorenzetti himself. With the electoral calendar in hand, the Court paves the way for a final judgment on the conviction. The Supreme Court flatly rejected Cristina Fernández de Kirchner’s challenge against Ricardo Lorenzetti in the Road Case and did so with the vote of [...] The entry Causes of Road: the Supreme Court rejected the challenge against Lorenzetti was first published in Pausa.

jujuyonlinenoticias.com.ar

Factuality

Ownership

The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation rejected the challenge filed by Cristina Kirchner's defense against Judge Ricardo Lorenzetti in the Highways case. This decision, adopted by the three judges of the Supreme Court—Horacio Rosatti, Carlos Rosenkrantz, and Lorenzetti himself—allows progress toward a final ruling in the case, which already has a six-year prison sentence and life disqualification for the former president for fraudulent admin…

Info Arenales - General Arenales

Factuality

Ownership

The Supreme Court flatly rejected Cristina Fernández de Kirchner's challenge against Ricardo Lorenzetti in the Highways case, and did so with Lorenzetti's own vote. Moreover, his participation was decisive, because the support of Horacio Rosatti and Carlos Rosenkrantz was insufficient, as three votes were needed. They would have had to call associate judges, and everything would have taken longer. The ruling appears to be a response to the Justi…