See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

Swedish report finds no evidence a Chinese-flagged ship intentionally damaged Baltic Sea cables

  • A Swedish report found no evidence that a Chinese-flagged ship intentionally damaged two undersea cables in the Baltic Sea last year, according to the Swedish Accident Investigation Board.
  • Investigators noted limitations in information that hindered certainty regarding intentional damage.
  • Chinese authorities led the investigation while Sweden participated as an observer, limiting Sweden's investigative capabilities.
  • Investigators faced constraints since Chinese authorities maintained jurisdiction, which prohibited criminal investigations and interview recordings.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?

36 Articles

All
Left
6
Center
9
Right
3
Right

The Swedish accident investigation authority did not find any clear evidence of sabotage on two Baltic Sea data cables by a Chinese ship. It could not be determined with certainty that the freighter "Yi Peng 3" deliberately dragged its anchor over the seabed to damage the two fiber optic cables in Swedish waters, the authority informed on Tuesday. However, the prosecutor told Reuters that it would continue to investigate the case separately. It …

·Vienna, Austria
Read Full Article
PolitikenPolitiken
Reposted by
Ekstra BladetEkstra Bladet
Lean Left

The ship 'Yi Peng 3' dragged anchor behind it for a day and a half, but authorities cannot prove that it was deliberate.

·Copenhagen, Denmark
Read Full Article
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 50% of the sources are Center
50% Center
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Winnipeg Free Press broke the news in Winnipeg, Canada on Tuesday, April 15, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)

You have read 1 out of your 5 free daily articles.

Join millions of well-informed readers who use Ground to compare coverage, check their news blindspots, and challenge their worldview.