Supreme Court weakens federal regulators, overturning decades-old Chevron decision
- The Supreme Court delivered a ruling weakening federal agencies' regulatory approval power, impacting various sectors like the environment and public health.
- This 6-3 decision changes the power dynamic between the executive and judicial branches, favoring conservatives to limit the reach of the "administrative state."
- The ruling overturns the Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council precedent, ending deference to federal agencies in creating regulations from ambiguous laws.
180 Articles
180 Articles
Supreme Court's decision on federal regulations started in Rhode Island
PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WLNE) — The Supreme Court decision to throw out 40-year-old precedent that gave power to federal agencies to create regulations started in Rhode Island. Rhode Island’s case involved two fishing boats who were required to hire and pay federal monitors, and was combined with a similar case from New Jersey for the court’s decision. The companies said they had no issue with the monitors being on the boats, but did take issue with h…
Supreme Court Overturns 1984 Chevron V. Natural Resources Defense Council Ruling
The Supreme Court has overturned the 1984 decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, which mandated judicial deference to agencies in cases where the law is unclear.


Supreme Court overturns 1984 Chevron precedent, curbing power of federal government
(CNN) — The Supreme Court on Friday significantly weakened the power of federal agencies to approve regulations in a major decision that could have sweeping implications for the environment, public health and the workplace. The 6-3 ruling, overturning a precedent from 1984, will shift the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches and hands an important victory to conservatives who have sought for years to rein in the regulator…
Colorado groups decry, cheer Supreme Court's decision to overturn Chevron deference
The Supreme Court has overturned the 40-year-old precedent that required federal judges to often defer to interpretations of laws made by federal agencies in their rulemaking. The decision reasserts the authority of the Judicial Branch as the arbiter of "what the law is" and puts the courts back in charge of determining if an agency's interpretation of a law is correct when that interpretation is challenged in court.
The Supreme Court weakens federal regulators, overturning decades-old Chevron decision
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday upended a 40-year-old decision that made it easier for the federal government to regulate the environment, public health, workplace safety and consumer protections, delivering a far-reaching and potentially lucrative victory to business interests.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 54% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage