US EditionSupreme Court Declines to Rush Petition Challenging Trump’s Tariffs
- A federal appeals court has allowed the government to continue enforcing President Donald Trump's tariffs while legal challenges proceed on appeal.
- The U.S. Supreme Court denied a request from Learning Resources to expedite the review of Trump's tariffs before lower courts have concluded.
- Multiple courts have found that Trump's tariffs do not comply with the legal authority granted by the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, and appeals are underway.
- The case raises 'issues of exceptional importance,' with hearings scheduled for July 31.
65 Articles
65 Articles
I scrapped a 600,000 square foot building project for my business due to tariffs. I want the Supreme Court to hear my case.
Rick Woldenberg, CEO of Learning Resources, scrapped a 600,000 sqft building project for his business due to tariffs.Learning ResourcesRick Woldenberg scrapped a 600,000 square foot building project for his business due to tariffs.Woldenberg is petitioning the Supreme Court to hear his lawsuit against Trump's tariffs.Woldenberg's business is in a soft hiring freeze, and it has paused most overseas ventures.This as-told-to essay is based on a con…
The chancellor led a commercial delegation that met Jamieson Greer in Washington.They seek to sign a pact to balance reciprocal exchange and lower taxes on steel and aluminum.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday rejected a motion from an Illinois toy company calling for a quick decision on the legality of President Donald Trump’s tariffs. Learning Resources Inc. wanted judges to address the case soon, rather than allow it to continue to develop in lower courts. The company argues that tariffs and uncertainty are having a “mass impact” on businesses across the country and that the issue needs rapid attention from the nati…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 68% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
