US EditionWoman Gets Engaged, Dies Hours Later L FOX 10 Talks
- In a decision handed down on the 27th of June, 2025, the highest court in the United States ruled in Trump v. CASA Inc. to restrict the ability of federal judges to issue injunctions that block government actions nationwide.
- The ruling stemmed from legal challenges to President Trump's January 20, 2017 directive aimed at restricting birthright citizenship, which had been halted nationwide by injunctions issued by three federal courts.
- The 6-3 majority opinion, authored by Justice Barrett, found that nationwide injunctions exceed federal courts' equitable authority under the Judiciary Act of 1789, allowing policies to proceed against non-plaintiffs.
- Legal experts Jonathan Turley and Andy McCarthy described the decision as "a victory for the Trump Administration" because injunctions had been freezing federal policy, though dissenting justices warned of increased executive power abuse.
- The ruling complicates constitutional protections for families, leading to a legal patchwork and possible increased executive power unless Congress enacts legislation to restore nationwide injunction authority.
40 Articles
40 Articles
InsideNoVA.com
SCOTUS ruling on universal injunctions to impact dozens of cases
(The Center Square) – The U.S. Supreme Court's Friday ruling limiting the power of judges to block a president's policies nationwide will have widespread implications for similar lower court decisions, an analyst says.
Woman gets engaged, dies hours later l FOX 10 Talks
FOX 10's Ron Hoon, Syleste Rodriguez, Ty Brennan and Anita Roman discuss the day's top stories. Topics include a marriage proposal that ended with murder, a Supreme Court ruling limiting the power to a single judge, a major ruling in the Brian Kohberger case, and more.
The Conversation
What the Supreme Court ruling against ‘universal injunctions’ means for court challenges to presidential actions
A journalist runs out of the U.S. Supreme Court building carrying a ruling on the last day of the court's term on June 27, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Chip Somodevilla/Getty ImagesWhen presidents have tried to make big changes through executive orders, they have often hit a roadblock: A single federal judge, whether located in Seattle or Miami or anywhere in between, could stop these policies across the entire country. But on June 27, 2025, the Su…
Expert warns Supreme Court to say goodbye to vacation: 'About to get inundated'
Slate legal reporter Mark Joseph Stern recalled an era in which the U.S. Supreme Court could take a few months off and have a kind of summer vacation. That is probably over, he cautioned when speaking to MSNBC. The high court issued a ruling Friday that eliminated nationwide injunctions by courts. I...
Jonathan Turley, McCarthy Say SCOTUS Case Will Stop ‘Small Attacks’ On Trump Policies
SCOTUS Decision Restricts Judicial Reach, Bolstering Presidential Authority George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley and former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy said Friday the Supreme Court’s decision limiting nationwide injunctions was “a victory for the Trump administration.” The Supreme Court found that district judges who issued so-called “nationwide injunctions” in response to President Donald Trump’s Jan. 20 executive [……
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 43% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
