US EditionAn Ontario Judge Tossed a Court Filing Seemingly Written with AI. Experts Say It's a Growing Problem
6 Articles
6 Articles
An Ontario judge tossed a court filing seemingly written with AI. Experts say it's a growing problem
Legal experts say an Ontario judge's criticism of a lawyer who seemingly leaned on artificial intelligence to prepare court materials is putting the spotlight on the dangers of AI tools that can produce false or fictitious information. That, in turn, can have real-life consequences, they say.
The Utah Court of Appeal decided to punish Richard Bednar for filing a document containing false quotations, generated by the AI.
Legal expert Damien Charlotin has compiled a database of lawsuits in which parties used fake legal content generated by artificial intelligence.
Since the launch of ChatGPT, AI has been used more and more frequently in court. However, this is not always good, as the well-filled database of a lawyer shows. In this case, AI chatbots have hallucinated in legal documents.read more on t3n.de
Lawyers submitted AI-generated fake legal content in at least 129 documented court cases
In 129 documented cases across 12 countries, lawyers have submitted fake legal content generated by AI tools like ChatGPT into court proceedings. The article Lawyers submitted AI-generated fake legal content in at least 129 documented court cases appeared first on THE DECODER.
Lawyers in currently 129 documented cases from twelve countries have proven to have brought false content invented by AI tools such as ChatGPT into court proceedings.The article ChatGPT in the courtroom: Database documents 129 fake cases first appeared on THE-DECODER.de.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Left
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
