US EditionPublished • loading... • Updated
Lawyers for Quebec government tell Supreme Court that Bill 21 is legitimate
The Supreme Court is reviewing whether Quebec's 2019 secularism law, Bill 21, can be shielded by the notwithstanding clause amid challenges from multiple rights groups.
- On Monday, the Supreme Court of Canada began four days of hearings into Quebec's Bill 21, a 2019 secularism law banning public-sector workers from wearing religious symbols and overriding the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
- The Coalition Avenir Québec government pre-emptively invoked the notwithstanding clause to shield the law from legal challenges, a novel approach that lower courts have upheld while questioning this unprecedented use.
- Challengers, including the English Montreal School Board, argued the law violates gender equality and linguistic minority rights that cannot be overridden by the notwithstanding clause.
- On Tuesday, Quebec government lawyer Isabelle Brunet told the seven-judge panel that the notwithstanding clause is a political compromise that precludes judicial review of the legislation.
- Legal experts warned the ruling could establish substantive limits on the clause, with lawyer Frédéric Bérard suggesting unchecked use could enable a future "mini-Trump" to override rights without constitutional checks.
Insights by Ground AI
36 Articles
36 Articles
Legault government lawyers invite the country's highest court to respect the parliamentary sovereignty of the National Assembly.
·Montreal, Canada
Read Full Article
The Toronto Star+2 Reposted by 2 other sources
Quebec’s secularism law threatens religious and equality rights, Supreme Court hears
Minority rights groups warned the Supreme Court of Canada Monday that religious and equality rights could be in jeopardy if it upholds Quebec's secularism law that bans religious symbols worn
·Toronto, Canada
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources36
Leaning Left21Leaning Right2Center4Last UpdatedBias Distribution78% Left
Bias Distribution
- 78% of the sources lean Left
78% Left
L 78%
15%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
