India Court Rejects X's "Free Speech" Argument, Backs Government Takedown Powers
The Karnataka High Court ruled that social media platforms like X Corp must comply with Indian laws and upheld government content takedown orders under the Information Technology Act.
- The Karnataka High Court rejected X Corp's petition on September 24, 2025, challenging content blocking orders via the Sahyog portal.
- X Corp argued the government used Section 79 to bypass stricter Section 69A procedures, labeling Sahyog a censorship portal.
- The court upheld Sahyog as a lawful tool under Section 79, stressing social media requires regulation and accountability.
- Justice M Nagaprasanna declared social media cannot be left in anarchic freedom and noted internet intermediaries must comply or lose safe harbour protections.
- The verdict affirms the government’s authority to regulate online content, with implications for all platforms balancing liberty and responsibility in India.
17 Articles
17 Articles
Karnataka HC rejects X Corp plea, upholds govt’s takedown powers
Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court on Wednesday dismissed social media giant X Corp’s petition challenging the authority of government officials to issue content take down order under the Information Technology Act and maintained that social media needs to be regulated. The bench presided over by Justice M Nagaprasanna stressed on regulation of social media, especially in cases of offences against women. It further said the Indian marketplace c…
Why Karnataka HC upheld Union govt’s Sahyog portal, rejected X’s challenge
The verdict concludes a significant legal battle in which X had characterised the Sahyog portal is a form of extra-legal 'censorship' and the government had defended it as an efficient tool for regulation.
Karnataka HC dismisses X’s plea against portal to streamline takedown orders
The Karnataka High Court on Wednesday dismissed a petition filed by social media platform X against Sahyog, a portal set up by the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre to “streamline” orders to take down content, Bar and Bench reported.X has described this portal as a “censorship portal”, and claimed that the Information Technology Act does not contain any provision to create such a portal, or to require social platforms to appoint a nodal off…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 56% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium