US EditionJustice Department Curtails American Bar Association’s Role in Vetting Trump’s Judicial Nominees
- U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi officially notified the American Bar Association it will no longer access judicial nominees to rate their qualifications as of 2025.
- This action followed long-standing criticism that the ABA shows progressive bias in rating judicial nominees, ignoring calls from Congress and legal academics to reform.
- The DOJ letter revoked decades of special access the ABA had to nominee information, citing unfair favoritism toward Democratic appointees and aligning with previous breaks made under Republican administrations.
- During President Trump's first term, the ABA rated 187 of 264 nominees as well-qualified but gave 10 a not-qualified rating, while some GOP senators dismissed ABA ratings as politically motivated.
- This decision ends the ABA's unique role in judicial vetting and signals ongoing partisan disputes over the fairness of the judicial nomination process.
35 Articles
35 Articles
Justice Department cuts ties with American Bar Association over biased judicial nominee reviews
US Attorney General Pam Bondi has informed the American Bar Association that it will no longer receive special access to information or participate in the judicial nomination process, citing longstanding concerns over political bias in the organization. In a letter addressed to ABA President Mary Smith Bay, Bondi criticized the organization for what she described […] The post Justice Department cuts ties with American Bar Association over biased…
DOJ Told American Bar Association It Will No Longer Comply with Ratings for Judicial Nominees
Thank you for this great article — it’s rare to find content that’s not only informative but also easy to follow. The way you structured your points made it very engaging to read. I really appreciate the clarity and depth you’ve added here. It’s clear that a lot of thought and experience went into creating this, and it definitely stands out compared to much of what’s out there. I’ve been exploring similar topics recently and always value perspec…
Bondi Tells American Bar Association DOJ Will No Longer Comply With Their Ratings for Judicial Nominees
"while the ABA is free to comment on judicial nominations along with other activist organizations, there is no justification for treating the ABA differently from such other activist organizations" The post Bondi Tells American Bar Association DOJ Will No Longer Comply With Their Ratings for Judicial Nominees first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion.
Attorney General Eliminates American Bar Association’s Role in Vetting Judicial Nominees
Attorney General Pam Bondi has ended the role of the American Bar Association (ABA) in vetting people nominated by the president to serve as judges. Bondi said in a May 29 missive to ABA President William R. Bay that the association “no longer functions as a fair arbiter of nominees’ qualifications and its ratings invariably and demonstrably favor nominees put forth by Democratic administrations.” She said that the association has refused to fix…
Attorney General Eliminates American Bar Association’s Role in Vetting Judicial Nominees - The Thinking Conservative
Attorney General Pam Bondi has ended the role of the American Bar Association (ABA) in vetting people nominated by the president to serve as judges. The post Attorney General Eliminates American Bar Association’s Role in Vetting Judicial Nominees appeared first on The Thinking Conservative.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 61% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
