US EditionPublished • loading... • Updated
Judge rules companies are entitled to refunds for Trump tariffs overturned by the Supreme Court
- On March 04, 2026, Judge Richard Eaton of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that companies that paid the tariffs struck down last month by the U.S. Supreme Court are entitled to refunds and he alone will hear cases about refunding the IEEPA duties.
- After the Supreme Court's Feb. 20 ruling that struck down the tariffs, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit sent the refund phase to New York trade court to sort out next steps.
- U.S. Customs must now design a mass refund process, but trade lawyers warn its system was not built for such a scale, with potential liabilities reaching $175 billion, according to Penn Wharton Budget Model.
- The judge set a Friday deadline for government counsel to propose refund methods for Atmus Filtration, Nashville, Tennessee, while another federal court rejected attempts to delay refunds on Monday.
- Reporters warn the administrative details will be decisive, cautioning that 'the devil will be in the details' as images from the Port of Long Beach on Feb. 20 and a cargo terminal in Frankfurt on Feb. 23 show import volumes.
Insights by Ground AI
81 Articles
81 Articles
Sask Today+10 Reposted by 10 other sources
Judge orders refunds after Supreme Court strikes down Trump's tariffs
Judge kicks off process to issue refunds for Trump tariffs
A federal court is kicking off the process that could force President Donald Trump's administration to start refunding tariff payments.According to Bloomberg News, "In an order on Wednesday, Judge Richard Eaton, who sits on the federal trade court in New York, ordered Customs and Border Protection to stop calculating President Donald Trump’s emergency tariffs on importers’ customs paperwork. He also questioned why the government was continuing t…
·United States
Read Full Article
Coverage Details
Total News Sources81
Leaning Left24Leaning Right4Center33Last UpdatedBias Distribution54% Center
Bias Distribution
- 54% of the sources are Center
54% Center
L 39%
C 54%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
