Justice Sotomayor’s Sloppy Reasoning in Skrmetti: Weak Analogies And Emotional Appeals

Justice Sotomayor’s Sloppy Reasoning in Skrmetti: Weak Analogies And Emotional Appeals

This week’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. Skrmetti revealed a stark contrast between rigorous constitutional analysis and sloppy judicial reasoning.While the six-judge majority correctly applied Equal Protection doctrine to uphold Tennessee’s commonsense restrictions on experimental medical treatments for minors, Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s dissent — to which her fellow liberal justices, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, signed o…

In Skrmetti Case, Justice Thomas Demolishes The 'Expert Class'

In U.S. v. Skrmetti, Justice Clarence Thomas demolished the Biden admin's reliance on the authority of the so-called 'expert class.'

Justice Sotomayor’s Sloppy Reasoning in Skrmetti: Weak Analogies And Emotional Appeals - Conservative Angle

This week’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. Skrmetti revealed a stark contrast between rigorous constitutional analysis and sloppy judicial reasoning. While the six-judge majority correctly applied Equal Protection doctrine to uphold Tennessee’s commonsense restrictions on experimental medical treatments for minors, Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s dissent — to which her fellow liberal justices, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, signed …