Skip to main content
See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

Holdout in Lindsay Clancy trial said he had reasonable doubt but still wouldn’t acquit, juror says

  • On Tuesday, three jurors from the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, which ended in a mistrial last week, discussed the proceedings with NBC10 Boston in an exclusive interview.
  • Following weeks of testimony at Plymouth Superior Court, jurors expressed frustration regarding one holdout juror who refused to engage with the rest of the panel's consensus on a verdict.
  • Regarding the deadlock, the jury foreperson noted the holdout juror admitted to having "reasonable doubt" yet refused to vote "not guilty by reason of insanity."
  • The jurors' decision to speak out offers rare insight into the high-profile case that drew significant attention throughout Aug, culminating in the mistrial at Plymouth Superior Court.
Insights by Ground AI
Podcasts & Opinions

179 Articles

Center

Members of the jury in Lindsay Clancy's trial made the first public statements about the deliberations conducted in secret and the reasons that led to the impasse in which they arrived, before this case of great resonance in the US ended with the annulment of the trial, writes BBC.

·Bucharest, Romania
Read Full Article
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 51% of the sources are Center
51% Center

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Life.ru broke the news on Tuesday, September 8, 2026.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)

Similar News Topics

News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal