Vance and Trump try good cop, bad cop on Greenland
- In March 2025, President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance renewed discussions about the U.S. Acquiring Greenland, a Danish territory, with Vance visiting a U.S. Military base on the Arctic island on Friday for three hours.
- Trump cited reasons such as fueling a manufacturing boom with Greenland's rare earth minerals, building a missile defense system, bolstering America's Arctic presence, and combating Russian and Chinese resource quests, while Vance presented a softer approach.
- Vance's visit and statements aimed to convey the U.S. Commitment to the region's security, suggesting that the acquisition would benefit Greenlanders, while Trump kept military force as an option, echoing similar American rhetoric from over a century ago regarding Greenland's strategic importance and resources.
- Vance stated, "We cant just ignore the presidents desires" and "We think were going to be able to cut a deal, Donald Trump-style, to ensure the security of this territory but also the United States of America," while Trump said, "I never take military force off the table."
- The proposal faced criticism and incredulity, with some fearing long-term damage to U.S. Alliances and leadership, and social media users questioning the administration's approach and whether Greenlanders desired American intervention, though Vance maintained Greenland's future should be determined by its residents.
9 Articles
9 Articles
Vance and Trump try good cop, bad cop on Greenland
ANALYSIS — Amid President Donald Trump’s talk of the U.S. acquiring Greenland, Vice President JD Vance has taken on a role of White House good cop, using softer language as his boss keeps the option of using military force on the table. During a three-hour visit Friday to a U.S. military base on the Arctic island, Vance did not speak of an invasion or air strikes to add the Danish territory to the American portfolio. Instead, he spoke in a sort …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 33% of the sources lean Left, 33% of the sources are Center, 33% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage