See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

All House Republicans reject Democratic attempt to force DOJ disclosure of Epstein documents

UNITED STATES, JUL 15 – Seven House Republicans blocked a motion in the House Rules Committee to allow a vote on releasing Jeffrey Epstein case files amid demands for government transparency.

  • On July 15, 2025, House Republicans voted 7 to 5 against a motion to allow a full House vote on releasing Jeffrey Epstein files, with Republican Ralph Norman joining Democrats in support.
  • The vote came after Rep. Ro Khanna introduced a Democratic amendment intended to require the Attorney General to make all documents concerning Jeffrey Epstein publicly available, amid ongoing debates and a recent DOJ and FBI statement denying the existence of a client list or evidence of blackmail.
  • Democrats emphasized the amendment's importance for transparency on Epstein's sex-trafficking case, while some Republicans and officials, including Chair Virginia Foxx, defended delaying release until the administration deemed appropriate.
  • A memo from the DOJ and FBI indicated that their review found no reliable proof that Epstein coerced well-known figures, challenging previous assertions and deepening rifts within the MAGA movement as well as increasing public doubt.
  • The vote's defeat signals continued partisan tension over Epstein records, with Khanna pledging ongoing efforts for disclosure and critics accusing the administration of shielding the powerful from scrutiny.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?

60 Articles

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 36% of the sources lean Right
36% Right
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Baller Alert broke the news in on Tuesday, July 15, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)

You have read 1 out of your 5 free daily articles.

Join millions of well-informed readers who use Ground to compare coverage, check their news blindspots, and challenge their worldview.