X Wins Free Speech Case in Australia
- Australia's Administrative Appeals Tribunal ruled on July 1, 2025, that the government wrongly ordered the removal of Canadian activist Chris Elston’s post on X in Melbourne.
- The case arose after the Australian eSafety Commissioner classified Elston’s critical post about a WHO transgender expert as cyber abuse and demanded X remove it under threat of a $800k fine.
- Elston, with support from X and legal organizations including ADF International, contested the censorship on free speech grounds; the Tribunal determined that Elston's post did not qualify as cyber abuse and overturned the removal order.
- Paul Coleman, who leads ADF International, described the decision as a clear victory for free speech and highlighted its significance in curbing excessive government control over online content.
- The ruling allows X to claim another legal victory in its broader free speech efforts and signals increased scrutiny over Australia's expanding censorship powers on foreign-owned platforms.
27 Articles
27 Articles
Elon Musk and X win fight against Australia's regulators
Sarah Ferguson presents Australia's premier daily current affairs program, delivering agenda-setting public affairs journalism and interviews that hold the powerful to account. Plus political analysis from Laura Tingle.
Australia stops censoring child safety activist for calling female who identifies as man a 'woman'
U.S. State Department had criticized ally for ordering X to block post about new WHO advisor by "Billboard Chris" Elston. Administrative tribunal says Online Safety Act requires "intention to cause serious harm," which wasn't proven.
A Blow To Global Censorship: ‘Billboard Chris’ Wins In Australia
Freedom of speech has won a decisive victory in Australia. On Tuesday, a Melbourne tribunal overturned the Australian government’s censorship order against Canadian street advocate Chris “Billboard Chris” Elston for an X post critical of gender ideology.Back in 2024, Australia’s eSafety Commissioner had ordered X to remove Chris’ post, claiming it constituted “adult cyber abuse” under the country’s Online Safety Act. The post linked to a Daily M…
Billboard Chris Wins Censorship Case in Australia
In a precedent for free speech, an independent tribunal found that the eSafety Commissioner made the wrong decision when she took down the X post of children’s safety advocate Chris Elston. [UPDATE] Australia’s Administrative Review Tribunal in Melbourne yesterday decided that Chris Elston did not violate Australia’s Online Safety Act in a social media post that criticized the inclusion of a transgender activist on a World Health Organization (…
US Congress report says Aussie eKaren colluded to suppress conservative speech - www.cairnsnews.org
AUSTRALIA’S so-called eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant should be sacked for showing herself to be anti-free speech and an abuser of law. An Administrative Review Tribunal has found Inman Grant illegally prosecuted Canadian activist Chris Elston for a post he made on X. And according to a US Congressional report, Inman Grant also faces international […] The post US Congress report says Aussie eKaren colluded to suppress conservative speech …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 65% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium