Denmark closes probe into Nord Stream blasts saying there’s not enough grounds for a criminal case
- Danish police have closed their investigation into the 2022 Nord Stream gas pipelines sabotage, citing intentional sabotage.
- Sweden and Germany also initiated investigations on the pipeline explosions.
- No criminal case will be pursued in Denmark due to lack of basis, with all countries maintaining secrecy in their investigations.
135 Articles
135 Articles
Denmark Ends Nord Stream Investigation Without Criminal Case
Denmark gave up on an investigation into the explosions that in 2022 ruptured the Nord Stream natural gas pipelines just outside its territorial waters, following a similar decision in neighboring Sweden earlier this month.
Nord Stream sabotage: Denmark closes probe into ‘intentional’ blasts
Danish police, on Monday (Feb 26) said that they are closing the investigation into the 2022 sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines carrying Russian gas to Germany. This comes weeks after Swedish prosecutors also dropped the probe and said they would hand over the evidence uncovered to the German investigators.
Danish police closed the investigation into the explosion of the Nord Stream gas pipelines connecting Russia and Germany in September 2022. Swedish police closed their investigation early February due to lack of jurisdiction to continue, meaning Germany is now leading the operation. Danish police in Copenhagen stated that "based on the investigation, authorities can conclude that sabotage of gas pipelines was likely. And at the same time, there …
Denmark has prepared the opening of leaks on Russian gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea “Severnyy Potok” and “Severnyy potok-2”. This was agreed by the police of the country, after which Denmark became the second country, closed this investigation - earlier this was done by Sweden. Pipelines were completed in the Swedish and Danish economic zones in September 2022. “The investigation led the authorities to the conclusion that the place of deliberat…
![TASS [🇷🇺-affiliated]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgroundnews.b-cdn.net%2Finterests%2F1c364c1e553231a17f22d4a16db85a51fb715dd3.jpg%3Fwidth%3D24&w=64&q=75){kind=small}
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 40% of the sources are Center
![TASS [🇷🇺-affiliated]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgroundnews.b-cdn.net%2Finterests%2F1c364c1e553231a17f22d4a16db85a51fb715dd3.jpg%3Fwidth%3D60&w=128&q=75)
![RIA Novosti [🇷🇺-affiliated]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgroundnews.b-cdn.net%2Finterests%2F2a0109015009cf4c268971a719f58598126b4051.jpg%3Fwidth%3D60&w=128&q=75)
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
