Federal judge rules ban on firearms in post offices unconstitutional
- A federal judge ruled that a U.S. Law banning firearms in post offices is unconstitutional.
- The judge referenced a 2022 Supreme Court ruling that recognized the right to carry handguns in public for self-defense.
- While the charge of illegal firearm possession was dismissed, another charge for resisting arrest was not.
26 Articles
26 Articles
Post Office Gun Ban Ruled Unconstitutional
The federal ban on firearms possession in post offices is unconstitutional. In a Saturday ruling, US District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle determined that the blanket ban violated the Second Amendment rights of a former postal employee who was charged with illegally possessing a gun in a federal facility. She dismissed part of the man’s indictment after concluding that a total gun ban in post… Source
Major 2A Win: Judge Rules US Law Barring Firearms from Post Offices Is Unconstitutional
A federal judge has delivered a major victory for supporters of the Second Amendment. According to Reuters, U.S. District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle ruled Friday that a federal law barring individuals from possessing a firearm in post offices is unconstitutional. Mizelle, who was appointed during the Trump administration, cited a 2022 Supreme Court ruling, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, that expanded the right to bear arm…
Major 2A Win as Judge Rules Anti-Firearm US Law Is Unconstitutional
A federal judge has delivered a major victory for supporters of the Second Amendment. According to Reuters, U.S. District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle ruled Friday that a federal law barring individuals […] The post Major 2A Win as Judge Rules Anti-Firearm US Law Is Unconstitutional appeared first on The Western Journal.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 73% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage