US EditionOne Small Mistake Could Trigger An Uncontrollable Escalation Between India and Pakistan
- On April 22, 2025, terrorists attacked tourists in Baisaran Valley near Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, killing 26 people and injuring many others.
- The attack prompted calls between US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Indian and Pakistani leaders amid India accusing Pakistan, which denied involvement and demanded a neutral probe.
- The US condemned the attack as terror, reaffirmed support for India, urged measured Indian responses, called for Pakistan’s cooperation, and maintained ongoing communication with both nations.
- US Vice President JD Vance stressed the need for India’s measured response to avoid broader regional conflict and urged Pakistan to help hunt terrorists, stating, "We hope, frankly, that Pakistan... Cooperates with India."
- The incident increased tensions with Pakistan, led to US repeat of prior crisis management drills, and signaled Washington’s intent to prevent escalation while supporting India's right to self-defense.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
22 Articles
22 Articles
All
Left
1
Center
4
Right
2
On Pahalgam, US following same drill on Pahalgam as Uri, Pulwama attacks: Report
As tensions between India and Pakistan continue to escalate after the Pahalgam terror attack, the United States is trying to use the same playbook it did during the Pulwama and Uri attacks to de-escalate the tussle
·Mumbai, India
Read Full Article
The US government has advised India to hold back in the current conflict with Pakistan.
·Germany
Read Full Article
Pahalgam terror attack: What US Vice President JD Vance advised India and Pakistan amid rising tensions? Top updates
Following the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, tensions between India and Pakistan escalate. US Vice President JD Vance urges India to respond cautiously to avoid regional conflict while emphasizing Pakistan's need to cooperate in combating extremism.
·New Delhi, India
Read Full Article
Coverage Details
Total News Sources22
Leaning Left1Leaning Right2Center4Last UpdatedBias Distribution57% Center
Bias Distribution
- 57% of the sources are Center
57% Center
14%
C 57%
R 29%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
