Skip to main content
See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

Is ‘A House Of Dynamite’ A True Story? How Realistic Netflix’s Nuclear Film Really Is

The Pentagon disputes the film's claim of 50% interception success, citing over a decade of 100% accuracy in missile defense tests, despite the film's dramatic portrayal.

  • On October 16, the Missile Defense Agency circulated an internal memo criticizing A House of Dynamite for fictional interceptors missing targets while real-world tests tell a vastly different story.
  • The thriller follows the 18 minutes after an ICBM launch aimed at Chicago, showing Army ground-based interceptors at Fort Greely, Alaska, where one fails to fire and the other misses.
  • The MDA argues testing records show a different picture, saying interceptors have displayed a 100 percent accuracy rate for over a decade and disputing the film's $50 billion cost figure.
  • In a statement to Bloomberg News, the Pentagon said it was not consulted and the film `does not reflect the views or priorities of this administration`, while the Missile Defense Agency told personnel to address false assumptions and frame interceptors as critical for national defence.
  • A 2020 Government Accountability Office report found the Pentagon spent about US$53 billion and planned about US$10 billion through 2025, with fewer than 50 ground-based interceptors managed by Boeing Co and operated under US Northern Command.
Insights by Ground AI

21 Articles

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 38% of the sources are Center
38% Center

Factuality 

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

The Straits Times broke the news in Singapore on Monday, October 27, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)
News
For You
Search
BlindspotLocal