US EditionWeinstein jury set to keep deliberating after tensions spill into public
- Harvey Weinstein, 73, faced a sex crimes retrial in New York, with the jury continuing deliberations into a fourth day on Tuesday.
- The retrial followed the 2020 conviction overturned by New York's highest court, requiring jurors to review evidence from three accusers, including Jessica Mann.
- Jurors requested electronic copies of emails about Mann and reported progress despite internal conflicts, such as some jurors pressuring others and discussing Weinstein's past.
- Weinstein pleaded not guilty, denied charges of two first-degree criminal sexual acts and one third-degree rape, and did not testify during the six-week trial.
- The ongoing deliberations and denied mistrial suggest a complex jury process with implications for Weinstein's appeal and the larger context of the #MeToo movement.
85 Articles
85 Articles
New York, United States.- Jury members in Harvey Weinstein's new sex crime trial seemed to be focused on one of his three accusers as the deliberations extended to a fourth day this Tuesday, with no further sign of the interpersonal tensions that had arisen earlier. The jury asked to start the day with electronic copies of emails and other evidence related to Jessica Mann, the accuser whose relationship with the film producer appears to be the m…
Fourth day of deliberations without verdict at the Weinstein trial.
New York, 10 Jun (EFE).- The jury in charge of discussing the new ‘ Harvey Weinstein case’ in New York concluded its fourth day of joint reflection this Tuesday without reaching a verdict, after requesting on several occasions the judge in charge Curtis Farber to review various evidence. The panel, made up of seven women and five men, has focused its attention during the last two days in the case of Jessica Mann, the complainant who accuses the …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 62% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
