Google Has an Illegal Monopoly in Ad-Tech Markets, Judge Rules
- A federal judge ruled that Google illegally monopolized the online advertising technology market, as stated by U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema.
- The Department of Justice argued that Google's practices forced higher prices for advertisers and reduced revenue for publishers, harming competition.
- The ruling found Google in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act by unlawfully tying its ad exchange to its publisher ad server, which forced higher prices on advertisers.
- Google plans to appeal the decision, claiming that their tools do not harm competition and arguing the ruling will negatively affect small businesses and innovation.
432 Articles
432 Articles
Google just lost a big antitrust case for running illegal ad tech monopoly
Google has lost yet another huge monopoly case — and the search giant is still facing another antitrust-related trial later this month. On top of that, the company just received an antitrust cease-and-desist order from Japan's Fair Trade Commission, which follows an antitrust fine upheld in 2024 by the European Union.On Thursday, a federal judge ruled that Google violated antitrust laws and illegally monopolized the online ad tech industry. In 2…

Judge declares Google's digital ad network an illegal monopoly
A federal judge branded Google an abusive monopolist Thursday for the second time in less than a year.
Google Is a Monopolist in Online Advertising Tech, Judge Says
WASHINGTON — Google acted illegally to maintain a monopoly in some online advertising technology, a federal judge ruled Thursday, adding to legal troubles that could reshape the $1.88 trillion company and alter its power over the internet.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 54% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage