Google Has an Illegal Monopoly in Ad-Tech Markets, Judge Rules
- A federal judge ruled that Google illegally monopolized the online advertising technology market, marking a significant win for the Department of Justice in its antitrust efforts.
- U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema found that Google violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by tying its publisher ad server, DoubleClick for Publishers, to its ad exchange, Google Ad Exchange.
- The ruling could lead to potential remedies, including the sale of Google Ad Manager, which combines both the publisher ad server and ad exchange.
- Google plans to appeal the decision, asserting that their tools do not harm competition, as noted by Lee-Anne Mulholland, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs at Google.
435 Articles
435 Articles
Google just lost a big antitrust case for running illegal ad tech monopoly
Google has lost yet another huge monopoly case — and the search giant is still facing another antitrust-related trial later this month. On top of that, the company just received an antitrust cease-and-desist order from Japan's Fair Trade Commission, which follows an antitrust fine upheld in 2024 by the European Union.On Thursday, a federal judge ruled that Google violated antitrust laws and illegally monopolized the online ad tech industry. In 2…

Judge declares Google's digital ad network an illegal monopoly
A federal judge branded Google an abusive monopolist Thursday for the second time in less than a year.
Google Is a Monopolist in Online Advertising Tech, Judge Says
WASHINGTON — Google acted illegally to maintain a monopoly in some online advertising technology, a federal judge ruled Thursday, adding to legal troubles that could reshape the $1.88 trillion company and alter its power over the internet.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 54% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage