US EditionUN experts denounce US violation of international law
7 Articles
7 Articles
Was Trump’s Maduro Operation Illegal? What International Law Has To Say
The abduction of Nicolás Maduro from Venezuela’s capital has set off extensive debates about its legality. International law scholars overwhelmingly assume that, regardless of its constitutionality, the action violated Venezuela’s sovereignty. In fact, there are strong international legal justifications for the operation. Indeed, at first glance, the invasion and abduction of Maduro would seem to be a “use of force... against the... political in…
International Academic Statement Against US Bombing of Venezuela and Kidnapping of President Maduro
Over 400 researchers and scholars from around the world signed a statement condemning the Jan. 3 US attacks and demanding reparations for Venezuela We, the undersigned scholars, students, and academic workers, unequivocally condemn the Trump administration’s January 3 strikes against Venezuela and kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores. The attacks are a flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter by a US preside…
UN experts denounce US violation of international law
In a joint statement, the special rapporteurs expressed their concern about the attack perpetrated on January 3 against the South American country, which included the kidnapping of President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores. They also stated that “any unilateral decision by the United States to temporarily place Venezuela under its control would violate international law and human rights, including self-determination.” Latin America is …
From the Teresa Carreño Theatre in Caracas, Foreign Minister Yván Gil led a meeting of the Network of Jurists to address the kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores. The minister denounced this fact as a serious violation of international law and...
GENEVA – More than 30 United Nations human rights experts condemned the U.S. military attack on Venezuela on January 3, and expressed concern about the impact on the fundamental freedoms of the “state of external shock” that has since ruled in the South American country. They “inequivocally” condemned the military intervention [...]
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 75% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
