Skip to main content
See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

Federal judges acknowledge court ruling errors tied to staffers’ AI use after Grassley inquiry

Two federal judges said AI-assisted drafting led to errors in court orders that bypassed normal reviews, prompting new policies to prevent future mistakes.

  • On Thursday, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley released letters showing U.S. District Judges Henry T. Wingate and Julien Xavier Neals admitted staff used generative AI to draft error-ridden orders entered before review in Mississippi and New Jersey courts.
  • Judge Neals said a law school intern used ChatGPT without authorization, while a law clerk used Perplexity, and the docketed early drafts reached the public record before routine reviews.
  • The orders contained incorrect citations and fabricated quotations attributed to defendants, and those withdrawn orders were called clerical errors after lawyers flagged inaccuracies.
  • Both judges adopted new review procedures to prevent similar errors; Wingate requires second independent review and printed citations, while Neals banned clerks’ AI use and added multilevel reviews.
  • Broader legal commentary notes rising AI use, and Grassley urged stronger rules, stating `Each federal judge, and the judiciary as an institution, has an obligation to ensure the use of generative AI does not violate litigants' rights or prevent fair treatment under the law`.
Insights by Ground AI

27 Articles

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 50% of the sources lean Right
50% Right

Factuality 

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

U.S. News broke the news in New York, United States on Thursday, October 23, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)
News
For You
Search
BlindspotLocal