US EditionTulsi Gabbard sidelined in Trump administration discussions on Israel and Iran: Report
- In March 2025, President Donald Trump and intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard publicly clashed over whether Iran is nearing the capability to develop a nuclear weapon.
- The split stemmed from Gabbard's testimony to Congress stating Iran is not pursuing nuclear weapons, conflicting with Trump's claim that Iran was near acquiring one.
- Following Israel's strikes on Iran last Friday, Trump fully supported Israel while sidelining Gabbard from key deliberations, including a Camp David meeting on U.S. involvement in the conflict.
- An official said Trump is not firing Gabbard since she is "not doing any harm," but Trump views her as "off message," especially after her video warning of nuclear annihilation risks.
- Republicans largely sided with Trump on Iran, and Gabbard's marginalization suggests ongoing internal disputes over U.S. policy toward Iran and Israel amid escalating regional tensions.
19 Articles
19 Articles
MIDWEEK WIRE – ‘MIA: Where’s Tulsi?’ – guests Arnaud Develay & Freddie Ponton
from 21st Century Wire: In this 21WIRE LIVE midweek edition with host Patrick Henningsen talking to guests, Associate Editor for Global Affairs at 21WIRE, Freddie Ponton, and author and international human rights lawyer, Arnaud Develay, to discuss the conspicuous White House fall-out and subsequent public disappearance of Trump’s Director of National Intelligence (DNI), Tulsi Gabbard, as the world inches close to nuclear […]
Rift Widens as President Trump Sidelines Tulsi Gabbard (But Here's The Truth.)
The cohesive unity of the Trump Administration as well as it's base of supporters represented across movements such as MAGA, America First, and conservatives in general is being put to the test. Or... is it simply being called in to question from the outside, as forces both 'foreign and domestic' ...
Trump Freezes Out Hegseth and Gabbard
“As President-elect Donald Trump assembled his core national security team early this year, congressional and media attention fell on two choices better known for their Fox News appearances and invective against a supposed “deep state” than for their executive branch experience: Director of Na
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources lean Left
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
