Never Miss a Perspective.
Published loading...Updated

Trump budget director faces bipartisan heat in Senate on DOGE cuts

  • Senators from both parties questioned Trump Budget Director Russell Vought on June 26 during a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing about the administration's $9.4 billion rescission package involving foreign aid and public broadcasting cuts.
  • The White House initiated this rescission process in early June, aiming for Congress to approve the clawback by the July 18 deadline or else the funds must be spent, while senators debated risks to programs and the appropriations process.
  • Senators such as GOP Chair Susan Collins and Sen. Mike Rounds emphasized the importance of protecting rural public broadcasting stations from the proposed funding reductions, while Sen. Jon Ossoff strongly criticized the plan to reduce the CDC’s budget by roughly 50% and eliminate about a quarter of its workforce.
  • Kentucky Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell criticized some foreign aid programs as "absolute nonsense masquerading as American aid" and called the administration's attempt to address this "unnecessarily chaotic," while Ossoff said, "You're crushing morale, capability, and destroying my constituents' lives."
  • The hearing displayed bipartisan skepticism about the rescission package's impact, signaling challenges ahead for the administration to secure enough votes in the Senate before the mandatory resubmission deadline.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?

23 Articles

All
Left
4
Center
9
Right
5
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 50% of the sources are Center
50% Center
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

PBS NewsHour broke the news in Washington, United States on Wednesday, June 25, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)

You have read 1 out of your 5 free daily articles.

Join millions of well-informed readers who use Ground to compare coverage, check their news blindspots, and challenge their worldview.