Supreme Court to Decide on Legality of Geofence Warrants

Supreme Court to Review Geofencing in Pivotal Case for Privacy Rights

The Supreme Court on April 27 will hear oral arguments in a case with major implications for privacy rights—and how law enforcement uses Americans’ cell phone data while investigating crimes. The case, Chatrie v. United States, centers on law enforcement’s use of “geofencing warrants”—judge-authorized requests for cell phone location data near the scene of a crime. Okello Chatrie told the Supreme Court that the government’s use of these warrants…

Supreme Court to hear geofence warrant case Monday in key privacy test (GOOG:NASDAQ)

Supreme Court geofence warrant case could reshape tech privacy rules, data collection, and valuations.

Supreme Court to decide on legality of geofence warrants

WASHINGTON — Okello Chatrie’s cellphone gave him away. Read more...

Bringing a smartphone to a bank robbery? 4th Amendment issue hits Supreme Court

Police track down unidentified suspects through smartphone data. The Supreme Court will decide whether such 'groundbreaking' tech is constitutional

The Supreme Court case that could redefine your digital privacy

Police in Virginia used a technique called geofencing to tap into Google's databases to find out who was near the scene of a bank robbery. The Supreme Court will consider whether it is constitutional.

The Supreme Court case that could redefine your digital privacy - TPR: The Public's Radio

Police in Virginia used a technique called geofencing to tap into Google's databases to find out who was near the scene of a bank robbery. The Supreme Court will consider whether it is constitutional. The post The Supreme Court case that could redefine your digital privacy appeared first on TPR: The Public's Radio.