Detectors, accusations and watermarks: AI changed the way to suspect a text. From Milei and Reidel’s paper to an award-winning novel in an international contest, the debate about who writes what is moving faster than the rules. Read more
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.
The Thelyson Orélien controversy about the use of artificial intelligence in publishing is readily presented as an ethical debate. It is, for a large part, a question of copyright — and, as such, it reveals a singular legal amnesia. Some publishers intend to detect, or even discredit, works written with the assistance of an AI, as if literary creation had always been a solitary act, pure and free from any outside intervention. The history of lit…
Detectors, accusations and watermarks: AI changed the way to suspect a text. From Milei and Reidel’s paper to an award-winning novel in an international contest, the debate about who writes what is moving faster than the rules. Read more