The Fight For Birthright Citizenship Is Now

Leahy Calls Supreme Court Birthright Citizenship Decision ‘Worst’ Since Plessy v. Ferguson, Praises Thomas Dissent

Michael Patrick Leahy, CEO and Editor-in-Chief of The Tennessee Star, criticized the U.S. Supreme Court's 5-4 decision striking down President Donald Trump's executive order restricting birthright citizenship, calling the ruling "the worst Supreme Court decision” since the late 19th century and arguing that Justice Clarence Thomas's dissent could become one of the court's most significant dissenting opinions.

The Deeper Meaning of Ketanji Brown Jackson vs. Clarence Thomas on Birthright Citizenship

The justices both claim history as their guide.

Letters to the Editor: Let’s apply Justice Thomas’ birthright citizenship argument to the 2nd Amendment

'Does [Justice Clarence] Thomas believe that authors of the 2nd Amendment only had single-shot muskets in mind — you know, the true meaning of the 2nd Amendment only being found in the context of the times?,' writes an L.A. Times reader.

The Fight For Birthright Citizenship is Now

The authors warn that the Court’s narrow reasoning, Justice Thomas’s dissent, and the President’s threats provide a roadmap to bypass the Constitution entirely.Read more...

LegalEagle — A VERY Narrow Win for Birthright Citizenship

SCOTUS barely ppholds the Constitution, for now, but this isn't over.