US EditionTexas lawmakers and leaders react to U.S. strikes on nuclear facilities in Iran
- On June 22, 2025, President Donald Trump announced U.S. military strikes on Iran’s three nuclear sites: Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan.
- The strikes followed two months of negotiations that failed after Iranian officials declared new enrichment plans and amid prior Israeli attacks on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.
- Texas politicians reacted splitly, with Republicans praising the president’s leadership and military precision while some Democrats warned of risking another endless Middle East war.
- Senator John Cornyn praised the strikes as an act of bravery and expressed gratitude to U.S. service members, while Congressman Greg Casar condemned President Trump’s actions, arguing that leading the country into a prolonged foreign conflict is unlawful.
- The strikes aimed to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons despite concerns that the Fordow site remained operational and regional conflict could escalate.
129 Articles
129 Articles
'How many?' Maria Bartiromo stumps Trump border czar on 'Iranian sleeper cells'
Border czar Tom Homan indicated that he didn't know how many "Iranian sleeper cells" were set to attack the U.S. after President Donald Trump ordered a strike on Iran's nuclear facilities."With the FBI picking up surveillance of Iranian operatives in sleeper cells here in America," Fox News host Mar...
Sen. Husted backs Trump in striking Iran
(WKBN) -- U.S. Sen. Jon Husted of Ohio's 6th District posted his reaction on X to President Donald Trump's announcement Saturday that the U.S. military has struck three Iranian nuclear sites. "In the absence of meaningful diplomacy from Iran, the president has taken appropriate action to prevent the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism from producing these weapons. Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Strength and certainty are the best pat…
General Roland Kather analyses the US military strike against the Iranian nuclear program. The facilities are likely to be destroyed so far that it would take years to restore them.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 55% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
